TO: Tejaswi Venumadhav Nerella, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA
FM: Bruce E. Camber
RE: Homepage(s): UCSB, IAS, Research, ADS, arxiv, INSPIRE, Overview, PhD Dissertation,
Heating of the intergalactic medium by the cosmic microwave background during cosmic dawn, Arxiv(43) (PDF), 2018
Third email: 17 October 2025
Dear Prof. Dr. Tejaswi Venumadhav Nerella:
Second email: 12 October 2024
Dear Prof. Dr. Tejaswi Venumadhav Nerella:
I noticed there was a visitor of our page about your work: https://81018.com/venumadhav/ (this page) so I reviewed it. With only my email to you from last year ( 31 December 2023), I decided to add a few references to your work going back, if possible, to the Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur.
Perhaps in our first email to you we should have asked: (1) Can we hypothesize what might be happening at the Planck scale? (2) Might we hypothesize that the Planck scale defines an infinitesimal sphere? (3) Might we hypothesize one Planck sphere per unit of Planck time? (4).Might that result in 18.5 tredecillion spheres per second? (5) Might we apply base-2 notation to impose an order on these spheres? We did: https://81018.com/chart/. (6) Might we look at the 64th notation at one trillionth of a trillionth of a second (yoctosecond) and assume all notations 64 and below represent an hypostatic order that predefines space-time?
In 1980 after spending a semester with Olivier Costa de Beauregard and Jean-Pierre Vigier (and a little time with d’Espagnat and Alain Aspect on a visit to Aspect’s lab), there seemed to be no way forward. I return to a business that I had started in 1970 and with luck, it became successful.
Now, there was and is a way forward. We may not have it fully demarcated by a long shot, but at least what we are proposing is a radically different paradigm.
I send you best wishes for your work. Did you happen to visit with Freeman Dyson while at IAS? He was one of the few who encouraged our early work. Wilczek did as well.
Most sincerely,
Bruce
First email: 31 December 2023 (lightly updated)
Dear Prof. Dr. Tejaswi Venumadhav Nerella:
We came into our studies of cosmology through a backdoor — embedded geometries. We were climbing around inside a tetrahedron and began dividing each edge by 2, connecting the new vertices and going deeper within. In just 45 steps were small enough to join up with the Higgs boson, and in 67 more steps we were within the Planck base units.
The Planck units were a new baseline.
We then multiplied that first edge defined by PlanckTime (and the first Planck Length) both by 2. As you’d expect, in 112 jumps we were back inside our original tetrahedron. Continuing on, in 90 more jumps we were out on the edge of the observable universe.
But it is 100% out of line with Big Bang Cosmology. Here the singularity is a transformation nexus. Could you and your students tell us where we are failing in our logic?
We made charts — https://81018.com/chart/ — and thought, “What a great STEM tool.” https://81018.com/stem/
Thank you. And, “Happy New Year!”
We’ve been digging away around this for far too long.
Bruce (and his many students)
Warmly,
