TO: Ben Joseph Green, Waynflete Professor of Pure Mathematics, University of Oxford, Oxford, England
FM: Bruce E. Camber
RE: ArXiv (94): Lower bounds for corner-free sets (10 Mar 2021)
Homepage(s): Oxford Royal Society, CV PDF, Wikipedia, YouTube: Fourier analysis
Second email: Sunday, March 21, 2021 @ 8 PM
Dear Prof. Dr. Ben Green:
- Have you ever considered Lemaitre’s 1927 model of a cold start with his primeval atoms? If not, why not?
- If so, might those primeval atoms be simple spheres defined by the Planck base units? If not, why not?
- If so, might Planck Time 5.39116×10-44 per second set a rate of expansion such that there are 18.5 tredecillion spheres per second? Again, if not, why not?
- If so, might we apply base-2 notations simply to group these spheres in a logical progression whereby from Planck Time to the current time there are just 202 notations and the process is still active? If not, why not?
- If so, might we assume cubic-close packing of equal spheres whereby tetrahedrons and octahedrons are generated?
May I go on? If it is so entirely naive that I lost you with each question, may I kindly ask that you advice me of such. Thank you.
Most sincerely,
Bruce
First email: Monday, October 1, 2012 @ 2:30 PM (updated links)
References: Homepage, Patterns in the prime numbers (PDF), Royal Society, Wikipedia
Professor Ben Green FRS
Dear Prof. Dr. Ben Green:
Thank you for all your work on prime numbers.
I have two questions based on a simple premise. If we apply base-2 exponential notation starting at the Planck Length (PL) and double it 202.34 times out to the edge of the observable universe and consider the PL a starting point so by the tenth doubling you have 1024 “somethings” and by the 20th doubling over 1 million and so on. Apply simple geometries, nesting and enfolding, and you have a simple model that high school kids understand. Why not? …fallacies in simplicity? Thanks. -Bruce
Model intro: https://81018.com/big-board/
Discussion: https://81018.com/home/
STEM tool: https://81018.com/stem/
###