Second email: Monday, February 29, 2016 @ 12:38 PM
Dear Prof. Dr. Mitchell J. Feigenbaum:
Unless it is just silliness, I will be reviewing the Feigenbaum constants with our high school math club, and once refined a little, then with three high school geometry classes.
Are we improperly using your constants?
There is an assumption that your constants can help us anticipate the tensions between quantum theory and relativity, and between linear and non-linear transformations.
First email: Thursday, January 14, 2016 @ 4:40 PM
Dear Prof. Dr. Mitchell Feigenbaum:
We discovered your work through Kepler, spheres, close cubic packing and base-2 notation. Then, we included the Feigenbaum constants within our listings of the top ten numbers and number groups in the universe. Our references to your work are here:
Ours is a rather odd view of a highly-integrated universe created in less than 202 base-2 notations from the Planck base units, i.e. Planck Time to the Age of the Universe. It all started in our high school geometry classes when we didn’t stop dividing in half the tetrahedron and then octahedron within it. http://81018.com
Would you advise us? Is there any possibility that we aren’t wasting our time? Thank you.