TO: Prof. Dr. Corrin Clarkson, University of Indiana (once at New York University)
FM: Bruce E. Camber
RE: Your arXiv articles, i.e. Three-manifold mutations (PDF) (2013); and your homepage including your Testimony, X-Twitter; especially your comments about pi: dimensional analysis, scale invariance, and functional dependencies.

First email: 29 November 2022 @ 11:57 AM Updated: 20 March 2023

RE: CORE-UA 110 Great Ideas in Mathematics Clarkson.pdf

“Two main goals: (1) to learn about new kinds of mathematical ideas that most of us had not seen before and (2) to gain a new appreciation for mathematics.”

Dear Prof. Dr. Corrin Clarkson:

From one of my many searches, I ended up on your pages referenced above. I was charmed with the notion that we all should expect to learn new  mathematical ideas. In our walk into new mathematical lands, we found no less than 30 new ideas for us over a period of several years. And, as we went along our way, we discovered those ideas were also new for most others: https://81018.com/presuppositions/

It all started with the tetrahedron: https://81018.com/tot-2/

Then the octahedrons with it: https://81018.com/octahedron/

Then came base-2 from the Planck Time to the current time in 202 notations: https://81018.com/chart/  In May 2022 we began asking questions about this peculiar object: https://81018.com/15-2/

We’ve even had the audacity to redefine pi (π) and to have it define everything everywhere for all time!

Are we crazy about math? Yes. We also just crazy. Probably. That is why I write to experts like you to try to keep us on the straight and narrow as we learn and discover! Are we beyond help?

Thank you.

Warmly,

Bruce

###