# On discovering the work of Albert-László Barabási…

ArXiv (51): Spectrum of Controlling and Observing Complex Networks March 2015
____________ Emergence of scaling in random networks October 1999
CV PDF
Homepage
Wikipedia

`Third email: 14 August 2019`

Dear Prof. Dr. Albert-László Barabási:

The Planck scale is still largely ignored. There is however, one simple equation that could change our perception of things: c = lP / tP The speed of light is equal to Planck Length divided by Planck Time. The simple mathematics bears it out. https://81018.com/chart/

If we assume cubic close packing and sphere stacking as a doubling mechanism so in effect we apply base-2 to mass-charge and time-length, at 67th notation (doubling) we are at the CERN-scale (particle physics). At the 116th we are well into the human scale. At the 143rd we are out to just over one second and at 169th over one light year. At the 202nd we have gone just beyond the Age of the Universe and size of the universe.

This network, grid or matrix essentially includes everything, everywhere for all time. Those first 64 or so doublings are below our scales of actual measurements yet could include the mind, consciousness, and ideation such as Plato’s forms, Aristotle’s Ousia, Bourbakian structure and so on. It is a sweet model, but so what?

Could we talk a little about its usefulness?
Thank you.

Most sincerely,
Bruce

`Second email: Thursday, 20 April 2017`

Dear Prof. Dr. Albert-Laszlo Barabasi:

I sent a note to Kim Albrecht this morning when I discovered the short video on the Science magazine’s website, The Network Behind the Cosmic Web. I believe the reason networks cohere from the microscopic to the macroscopic is that it all begins at the Planck scale and doubles, essentially using a base-2 exponentiation creating an isotropic and homogeneous universe in just over 202 notations. Within the human scale vis-a-vis Planck Length from the 67th (particles) to 134th (up in the range of the International Space Station), there is a certain openness (currently known as quantum fluctuations) that provides for the diversity and exceptions. More on that to come.

I entered Boston University through the Cohen/Wartofsky door and their Boston Colloquium for Philosophy of Science. In 1971, it became my new religion. I was an associate of Synectics Education (an Arthur D. Little invention-lab spin off with WJJ Gordon), a tag-a-long with Arthur Loeb (Philomorphs) and Bucky, and a groupie of Dennis Meadows and Jay Forrester at Sloan at MIT.

Of course, I would so thoroughly enjoy hearing from you. The letter to the AAAS that eventually brought me to you is posted on our website.

Most sincerely,
Bruce
****************
Bruce Camber
http://81018.com
https://81018.com/chart
New Orleans

`First email:  3/24/15`

DearProf. Dr. Albert-Laszlo Barabasi:

If the Planck Units are “the singularity” and the network is absolute, then there is a continuity equation or two that our academic community has missed. That continuity could be simple, like base-2 exponential notation from the Planck Time to the current time, which our high school kids in New Orleans uncovered in December 2011.  Your thoughts?  -Bruce

P.S. I would refer you to three articles and two charts:
Our very first page: https://81018.com/home/
What surprised us: https://81018.com/2014/12/01/door/

Our most current analysis: https://81018.com/
Chart #1 is named, Big Board-little universe: https://81018.com/big-board/
Chart #2 is a Mathematically-integrated Chart of the Universe: https://81018.co0m/chart/