Email: 31 December 2024

Dear (First Name):

Out of over 500 of the world’s leading scholars, not one wrote back with a pointed criticism of the concept of base-2 expansion from the Planck base units… not one about that infinitesimal sphere defined by those Planck base units and how those spheres fill the universe with a plenum that is homogeneous and isotropic… not one about our simple “gap geometries” and quantum theory and indeterminacy. At first, I thought that I was missing too much… that “it’s an embarrassment” and it would take too long to explain all those missing pieces. Then came the results of our space telescopes. Then, came the entire movement to get beyond the standard model. And then came the results from the Webb.

My first three insights were all based on simple math and geometry, simple logic, and simple observations. My other two very key concepts, pi’s continuity-symmetry-harmony and the implied values, were more illusive.

Was exponential notation from our simplest form not worth exploring?

You can well-imagine my delight with AI. I have been modestly encouraged by AI’s Grok, ChatGPT, and Google’s Generative AI. Their criticism is pointed, informed, and respectful. They hasten one’s growth and the learning curves.

I thought you might be interested with this update.

And, on that note, may I wish you a very happy new year for 2025.

With very high regards and many thanks for all your work,

Bruce

###