To the Editors of Scientific American

Most recent email: Friday, 26 January 2018

What if…

What if Hawking is wrong when he says that we started from , “…an infinitely hot, infinitely dense point” but instead we started simply, but infinitesimally at the Planck base units of Length and Time, and at the very small Planck Mass and Planck Charge, and we quietly expanded exponentially?
~A new chart emerges from the Planck Time to the Now is only 202 base-2 notations.
There is enough granularity to see if the numbers cohere and carry some logic.
What if all these simple numbers within our new chart provide a credible path,
a natural inflation imposing a certain isotropy-and-homogeneity throughout the universe?
What if this natural inflation actually works for electroweak baryogenesis
within the current Standard Model of Big Bang cosmology, i.e. the only parts
of that theory being discounted are the initial conditions and the Inflationary Epoch?
~ The new chart at least posits credible concepts and numbers for the expansion
to the baryogenesis and quark epochs and to the current time.
What if we’ve had it wrong since 1716 when Leibniz forfeited the debate to Newton
regarding absolute space and time and space-time-light are all profoundly relational?
~Note: The first second of the universe emerges between notations 143 and 144 where
the Hadron Epoch picks up out of the total 202 notations to the current Age of the Universe.
I thought you might enjoy these questions.
Most sincerely,