Dear
The big bang theory is challenged by observations. We should be thinking about alternatives. As a thought experiment or the start of a toy model:
1. Assume the first manifestation of a thing is a geometrically simple infinitesimal sphere defined by the Planck base units with facets defined by the four primary irrational numbers. See a dynamic illustration.
2. As a thought experiment, follow the simple stacking-packing-triangulating of spheres beginning at Notation-0.
- Assume Planck Length is the first instantiation of space while Planck Time is the first moment of time and with the other base units defines thing.
- π’s continuity (infinite digits), symmetry, and harmony (Fourier dynamics) bridge the discrete Planck scale to continuous spacetime, avoiding the singularities of the Big Bang.
- The 202nd notation contains the current time, the Now. Once activated, all notations remain active, building on each other.
3. The first second of the universe is within Notation 143, the first year within Notation-169, the first 1000 years within Notation 179 (and 189-one million and 199-one billion).
4. Assuming one Planck Sphere per unit of Planck Time-Planck Length, and unit of Planck Mass-Planck Charge, it calculates to be approximately 18.5 tredecillion spheres per second: https://81018.com/tredecillion/
5. Using those figures, Grok and ChatGPT calculate the Hubble Tension to be 71km/s/Mpc: https://81018.com/hubble-derivation/
6. The universe is outlined in 202 notations: https://81018.com/10-notations/
7. Infinities of the four primary irrational numbers are the stabilizers of those infinitesimal spheres within Notation-0: https://81018.com/Planck-Polyhedral-Core/ The densities and speed create perfect stacking-packing
8. Natural gaps within tetrahedrons, octahedrons, dodecahedrons and icosahedrons open dissonance, indeterminacy and creativity (enchantment) which are first measured in and around Notation-64.
As a thought experiment alone, does it open a possible alternative? Thank you.
Sincerely,