Is There A Way To Find New Solutions To Old Problems?

Center for Perfection StudiesThe Big Board–Little Universe Project • New Orleans • USA • March 10, 2017 •
Homepages: Prior | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 16 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17| Original

An Open Letter

by Bruce Camber

Dear Visitor and Reader,

Is there an integrative set of concepts that can help to build bridges between hostile people? Worldviews have become so small in light of our new high-definition cosmology with her trillions of galaxies. It all seems so overwhelming. We, the people, seem so trivialized by our latest advances within the sciences. Does it seem possible that, just maybe, we are all working within the wrong model of the universe?

Here is an introduction to a very simple integrative model of the universe; it needs critical review. It needs people to challenge it! We will start at the very smallest mathematical unit that is a measure of time — it is called Planck Time. Our goal is to get to the largest unit; it’s called The Age of the Universe. That’s just a bit of commonsense. Base-2 exponentiation — multiplying by 2 — is also a very simple concept; but when applied to Planck Time, it becomes mind-boggling. Planck Time is so small it will take 144 times — multiplying each new number by 2 — before we finally break through one second. Yes, at the 143rd notation, the universe is just over a second old. Within just 58 more notations (200+ notations), the universe will become its current age — 13.8 billion years old and it continues to get older, second by second.

That’s hard to believe; just over 200 doublings define the universe. Scroll that chart and look at all the simple numbers. It makes the old chessboard and wheat story look small.

The key question is, “What does it mean when lifted up as the beginnings of an integrated universe view?”

Can you help us figure it out? Here is our guess: Here is our story:

Thanks. -Bruce



Time is past, present, and future; and, space is defined by three dimensions: height, width and depth. Of course, there is a certain truth within our commonsense views, but these truths are relative and personal and do not apply universally. In a rather unusual sense of the word, it is as if we each create our own universe.

Continued here…

Top Stories

Can you guess?

Article: Flooding the Big Bang
• Essay: A Quiet Expansion
• Is an implosion already underway?
• Emails: HawkingGuth Linde
• Director General, CERN, Geneva

Your comments welcomed:
Finite and Infinite: What’s the question?
Quiet Expansion of the Universe: Learning from scholars like Frank Wilczek (MIT) and Freeman Dyson (Institute for Advanced Studies) can be intimidating. Trying not to be overwhelmed by their expertise, we shift our focus from particles to systems.
#1 Top Ten (updated as a result of reader’s input)
We Live Like Kings and Queens
The Numbers: A horizontally-scrolled chart with 12 rows and 204 columns which makes up 34-pages side-by-side, and over 2000 blocks of information to analyze and eventually to understand.
More Numbers: The Universe From Scratch
Value values, ethics and integrity
Big Bang: #10 Bully #9 False Start #8 Hot head
Politics and the mind

Help Wanted
Your Questions/Our Answers: Ask a question, especially about the chart, and we will attempt to answer it!
To the Top Guns of Physics & Cosmology
To Our Global Pop Stars & Others: An appeal to Katy Perry, “Become a spokesperson. Spread the word.”

News / Research opens for business: There are many websites associated with these efforts. Most attempt to capture historical moments in time and to analyze its possible role within academic work. There hasn’t been a place for personal reflections. That changes today.

Universe View: What is your expertise? There are many blanks; and all cells — over 2000 of them — will always be “under construction.”

Prior Homepages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 16 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17