Our Minds and Spirits Must Be Freed From All the Big Bang Nonsense*

“The Big Bang Is Wrong,” Says Neil Turok, “There is a perpetual state of big bangs.”

Center for Perfection StudiesThe Big BoardLittle Universe Project • USA • September 26, 2017 •
Homepages:.Just Prior|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|10|11|12|13|14|15|16|17|18|19|20|Original
Introduction: Prof. Dr. Neil Turok is a long-standing friend of Stephen Hawking. He has been the co-author1 of several articles with him.  When Turok was the head of the department from 1997-2008 at Cambridge University (DAMTP2), Hawking was the Lucasian Professor (1979-2009). Today Turok is one of the most credible critics of the big bang theory as constituted by Hawking. Turok believes the universe operates as if it is constantly starting from scratch.  More

“According to the big bang theory…”

Yes, scientists and scholars continue to cite the big bang as if it is deep truth. It will require an alternative theory before those citations stop.  As more and more scholars take this old theory to task  — and there are good reasons to do so — alternatives will emerge.

Not a Bang, a Bounce or a Bubble, but a Quiet Expansion

Here’s our simple, rather-naive, alternative theory:
1. Assume Planck Time-Planck Length demarcate the beginning of the universe (good possibility).
2. Multiply the Planck base units by 2, over and over and over again. In 67 notations (doublings) you will have defined a small-scale universe. The CERN-scale begins at 67. Human hair is at 101. You and humans generally are within 116. By the 134th notation, you will be up on the International Space Station and you will have defined a human-scale universe. In the next 67 notations you will then define the large-scale universe. And, that is the entire universe in 202 steps, doublings or base-2 exponential notations. A key to it all is the definition of space and time.
3. Assume that the infinite is continuity, symmetry and harmony (and that is all science needs to say about the infinite). Now all 202 steps can be inter-related  as each doubling actively and currently defines a key element of this universe.  Now, how do we define that finite-infinite bridge?  And, what about all those big bang epochs?  More...

Our chart is a comprehensive. It is a very simple model of the universe. And, it is in a perpetual state of beginnings, yet at the start, all are infinitesimally small, not infinitely hot and infinitely dense. This theory is fully integrated, entirely predictive, and can easily be compared and contrasted with the Hawking Big Bang Theory.

Measuring the Universe Using the Planck Units: To take a closer look, we did a sampling of six sets of numbers, nicely distributed across all 202 notations. That is a the start of our deeper analysis.

How did it all begin? We are currently re-examining the circle, following every possible motion, especially within the constant flow of the never-ending, never-repeating numbers that define circles and spheres. We are exploring how this flow of numbers could become the spark that creates Planck charge.  There are other primary actions to analyze that use four, five or six tetrahedrons bound around a common centerpoint. Four are known as the amplituhedron.  Five we call the pentastar. Six give us the base of the hexagonal plates within the octahedron.  All may well hold the infinitesimal beginnings of motion.

Let’s get a handle on the big bang theory:

The working symbol statement of current theory

For more:

1  Co-authors Hawking-Turok

Here are just four articles in ArXiv alone. Additional papers will be added to this list as other sources are checked. Click on the title for that ArXiv listing  as of  September 2017.

Going by the  numbers:  17 Gravitational Waves in Open de Sitter Space (2000),  38 Open Inflation, the Four Form and the Cosmological Constant (1998), 42 Comment on `Quantum Creation of an Open Universe’, by Andrei Linde (1998), and 44 Open Inflation Without False Vacua (1998).

2  DAMTP: Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics •

From within one of  the world’s most-respected academic centers, we can readily see how one person can influence the culture of a school (University of Cambridge), a country (England), and the world simply by studying the effects of just two of the Lucasian Professors over the years. Of course, that is Isaac Newton (1669-1702) and Stephen Hawking (1979 to 2009).  One of Newton’s key ideas, absolute space-and-time, is wrong, yet most of the world’s people still take it as just commonsense. Likewise, Hawking’s big bang theory is also wrong, yet it is now part of the global culture’s belief system.  Both contribute to a value-neutral system of belief, and that, too, is wrong.

* This Is Serious Business.

We are asking for your help. There should be a tab or two, or more, just below to share this document. For example, if you have a Twitter account, a link to it should appear just below. If more than one tab appears, please click on at least one of them. Let’s get a discussion going about this topic.